An Overview of Michael Lacey In Mathematics Pursuance

Michael Lacey is a recognized mathematician who has done several types of research and won many awards. An example of the awards is the Simons Foundation and the Guggenheim. Lacey joined Georgia Institute of Technology in 1996. He has been a director of various training grants like the VIRGE and MCTP from the NSF. The above grants support many undergraduate student and postdocs. Lacey has counseled some undergraduates into correct and fruitful graduate programs. His students in the Ph.D. level have achieved so well and now lead in academic and industrial sectors. Michael Lacey boasts in mentoring over ten postdocs. He has broad experience in pure mathematics and his research interests are based on harmonic analysis and probability. Lacey is a loved mentor by doctorate and pre-doctoral students who emerge very successful through his hands. Many pass gratitude for helping them, guiding them, even with motivations and various recommendations in their course line, which has allowed them to achieve different awards.

 

Lacey was born in 1959, now an American mathematician. He received a Ph.D. from University of Illinois in 1987 at the Urbana-Campaign under Walter Philip direction. Lacey’s thesis stood out from any other based on probability in Banach Spaces where he attended to solve an issue relating to the law of the iterated logarithm of characteristic empirical functions. Throughout his career life, Michael Lacey has touched many lives academically in the areas of ergodic theory, probability, and harmonic analysis. Following his career, the first postdoctoral post he ever held was at Louisiana State University and University of North Carolina at the Chapel Hill. Between 1989 and 1996, Lacey served at Indiana University and at the same time received a National Science Foundation postdoctoral fellowship. It is during that fellowship period that he began to study bilinear Hilbert transform. After solving this, they received an award of Salem Prize. Since 1996, Michael Lacey has lectured and directed students in mathematics faculty at the Georgia Institute of technology. In 2012, Lacey became a fellow of American Mathematical Society. The faculty of mathematics at the university is dedicated and moved by the mission to build a new American community in statistical and mathematical sciences.

Jeremy Goldstein: Who Believes in Stock Options Anymore?

It’s a miracle that anyone these days knows what an employee benefit is anymore. For the last decade, the corporate world has been slowly phasing stock options out of the picture in favor of more preferable benefits. Some corporations have stopped providing benefits altogether.

While whether to offer benefits isn’t really a big discussion, the discussion of whether to offer stock options is increasingly relevant. There are a lot of opinions about the subject out there, but very few sources have creditability. One expert offering his opinion is Jeremy Goldstein, a 15-year business lawyer in New York.

Jeremy Goldstein started his own firm a few years ago after working at Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen, and Katz for a number of years. He started working there after graduating college and made it to partner before leaving. Now, his firm handles some of New York’s biggest corporate transactions for clients such as Verizon, AT&T, Bank One, and Duke Energy.

As previously stated, he started working at Wachtell after college. His college years were filled with all sorts of honors and programs certificates. Jeremy Goldstein holds numerous degrees from New York University School of Law, the University of Chicago, and Cornell University.

In his opinion, corporations need to continue offering stock options as a benefit. He’s not saying that it’s the right choice for everyone, but too many corporations are eliminating stock options just because other compensation methods are easier. If companies want their employees more invested, stock options may be the way to go.

Jeremy Goldstein wants everyone to remember the advantages that come with stock options. Firstly, stock options provide an understandable level of equivalency to employees. Other benefits aren’t so easy to understand when compared to other employees, which allows for higher pay to certain employees for no work-related reason.

Secondly, stock options personally invested the company’s success. The more successful the company is, the higher the stock value rises. This allows employees to see their work directly affecting the company’s value. They may work harder to satisfy customers and develop innovative products if they know their stocks will rise because of their efforts.

The less obvious advantage is how the IRS affects compensation methods. As more corporations stop providing stock options, they choose to go with equities instead. Recent IRS rules have made equities a little tougher to provide. Learn more: http://officialjeremygoldstein.com/